MSNBC – Dr. Anthea Butler https://antheabutler.com Givin it to you straight... no chaser Sun, 09 Oct 2022 20:23:46 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.2 https://antheabutler.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Antha-Butler-image-1-2-150x150.jpg MSNBC – Dr. Anthea Butler https://antheabutler.com 32 32 For a Herschel Walker win, Georgia’s evangelicals are willing to sell their souls https://antheabutler.com/for-a-herschel-walker-win-georgias-evangelicals-are-willing-to-sell-their-souls/ Sun, 09 Oct 2022 20:14:51 +0000 https://antheabutler.com/?p=2671 For a Herschel Walker win, Georgia’s evangelicals are willing to sell their souls Read More

]]>

Standards mean little to white evangelicals who crave political power.

The devil went down to Georgia this week, and he was surprised to find that white evangelicals had already beat him to soul stealing. This time, though, no amount of good fiddle playing is going to make the state’s evangelical voters let go of Republican Senate candidate Herschel Walker, an anti-abortion rights candidate accused of paying for a former sexual partner’s abortion in 2009.

A few decades ago, the allegation that he paid for an abortion would have disqualified Walker from consideration by white evangelicals.

That woman, whose name we don’t know, told The Daily Beast that she has a canceled check Walker gave her to pay for the abortion and a get-well card he signed for her after the procedure. After Walker denied paying for an abortion and denied having any idea who his accuser could be, she gave the news outlet permission to identify her as the mother of one of his children, one of the children whom he hadn’t publicly acknowledged at the start of the campaign. As she put it, “He didn’t accept responsibility for the kid we did have together, and now he isn’t accepting responsibility for the one that we didn’t have.” The New York Times reported Friday that the woman said Walker wanted her to abort another pregnancy in 2011 but that she refused and gave birth to their now 10-year-old son.

 

A few decades ago, the allegation that he paid for an abortion would have disqualified Walker from consideration by white evangelicals. He definitely would not have been their preferred candidate. Not anymore. Today’s MAGA evangelicals are willing to forgive anything and everything for their candidates — as long as they keep running as hardline MAGA Republicans.

You’re not alone if you find this all hard to understand. You may be like those politicos and opinion writers who took white evangelicals at their word when they professed to have strong beliefs about morality, family and abortion. But the historical truth, as I have shown in my book, “White Evangelical Racism: The Politics of Morality in America,” for evangelicals, is the politics of morality isn’t about their candidates’ morality. It’s about legislating their particular brand of morality for others who are outsiders to the faith.

Their Christian beliefs, while seeming rigid to outsiders, allow for those who have transgressed (especially men who have transgressed) to seek forgiveness and say they’ve been forgiven. In the case of someone like Walker, who continues to deny that he paid for an abortion, the reality is, even if he admitted that he did, they would still accept him. The apparent lies are for the benefit of the media.

The support that Walker, a legendary running back at the University of Georgia, enjoys from many white politicians and churches makes him a unique figure in this morality play. By virtue of his willingness to continue to play along, to continually protest his innocence even in the face of his son Christian Walker’s tweets that he was a horribly violent father pretending to be a “moral, Christian, upright man,” he can present himself as the aggrieved party who’s being attacked by vicious political forces.

What his son says and what the woman who claims Herschel Walker paid for her abortion says may sound persuasive to everybody else, but to white evangelicals, these attacks are lies, sent by the father of lies, that is, the devil. According to leaked video, at a prayer meeting for Walker at First Baptist Church in Atlanta the day after The Daily Beast’s initial story about the abortion was published, Anthony George, the senior pastor, prayed: “We ask you to rebuke the devil … Satan will not get the victory.”

While this hypocrisy is deplorable, it is part of the tactical religious strategy that works for the Republican Party. Though it promotes policies that don’t even consider a threat to a mother’s life as justifying an abortion, male candidates suspected of gross hypocrisy can find forgiveness from Republicans thirsty for power. Consider what right-wing television and radio host Dana Loesch said about the allegation that Walker paid to terminate a past partner’s pregnancy: “I don’t care if he paid some skank! I want control of the Senate

Morality is not something that white evangelicals actually demand of their candidates. What they want is for their chosen candidates to bring them power and prestige. They want their candidates, such as former President Donald Trump, to deliver policies, judges and laws that erase abortion and same sex-marriage rights. Their aim is not democracy, but theocracy.

Radio host Dana Loesch said: “I don’t care if he paid some skank! I want control of the Senate! “

That is why white evangelicals continue to vote for such candidates, despite their moral failings. To them Herschel Walker, a Heisman trophy winner who allegedly paid for an abortion is better than Sen. Rafael Warnock, who holds a doctorate from Union Seminary and pastors Atlanta’s Ebenezer Baptist church, the church Martin Luther King Jr. pastored. Right-wing talk show host Erik Erickson, after initially dismissing the allegations against Walker as “old news” and something everybody already knew, went so far as to claim that Warnock is not a Christian.

It’s clear to anyone who can see that white evangelicals, who have a symbiotic relationship with the Republican Party, are not looking for candidates that are pristine, only those they think can win. No one should expect evangelicals or their candidates to live by what they want the rest of us to live by. In 2016, they quickly forgave Trump after that Access Hollywood tape captured him boasting of how he grabbed women inappropriately, and they voted for him in record numbers.

No one should be surprised that Walker is getting a pass or that the devil looking to trade Georgia’s white evangelicals’ souls for his fiddle would find that they’d already given it away — in pursuit of power.

https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/herschel-walker-win-evangelicals-are-willing-sell-their-soul-n1299416

]]>
America’s Catholic bishops are trying to punish Biden for his stance on abortion https://antheabutler.com/americas-catholic-bishops-are-trying-to-punish-biden-for-his-stance-on-abortion/ Sun, 04 Sep 2022 02:09:12 +0000 https://antheabutler.com/?p=2485

By Anthea Butler, MSNBC Opinion Columnist
Catholics and Protestants used to literally fight each other in the streets of U.S. cities like Philadelphia. Back in the 19th century, it was the ethnic and religious antagonism that fueled these brawls. Now, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops is fighting a different sort of battle, against a different sort of “enemy.” The bishops are lining up to deliver below-the-belt hits to a fellow Catholic, President Joe Biden. And instead of fists, they are using a Communion wafer, the “body of Christ,” to wage political division.

The decision at the USCCB’s June meeting to draft a document to examine the “meaning of the Eucharist in the life of the church” is not simply a theological exercise but a political flex. It is designed to strengthen the U.S. bishops’ conservative ranks and to express their displeasure over Biden’s pro-abortion rights political stance. It also has implications for the coming 2022 election cycle, despite protestations to the contrary.

The decision at the USCCB’s June meeting to draft a document to examine the “meaning of the Eucharist in the life of the church” is not simply a theological exercise but a political flex.

But as with so much polarizing rhetoric, this fight threatens to keep moderate and liberal Catholics from coming back to Mass after lifting Covid-19 restrictions, and it could further enflame arift between liberal and conservative Catholics in America. While other issues such as racism, immigration and the pandemic have received some attention from the USCCB, the Communion wars seem to be the hill the group wants its relevance to die on.

This is not the first time, however, that the Catholic bishops have played hardball with Communion. Culture warrior and retired Archbishop Charles Chaput of Philadelphia made headlines back in 2004 as archbishop in Colorado by saying that voting for a presidential candidate like John Kerry (who supported abortion rights) would be a sin. In order to receive Communion, Kerry supporters would need to confess, Chaput said. And in a recent article, Chaput stated that allowing Biden to take Communion would bring “scandal” on the church and faithful Catholics.

Churchgoers in England surprised by the Bidens during Sunday Mass
JUNE 13, 202101:18
The real scandal, of course, is the politicization of the USCCB and its deliberate flouting of the statement sent to the board from Cardinal Luis Ladaria, prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which called on the bishops to meet with Catholic politicians in good faith and try to understand the nature of their pro-abortion rights positions and their comprehension of Catholic teaching. Ladaria’s statement was also reflective of the pope’s thinking; he recently stated, “The Eucharist is not the reward of saints, no, it is the bread of sinners.”

In other words, according to Pope Francis himself, the Eucharist is not for the perfect, nor the doctrinally pure, but for those who have “fragilities.” Contrary to this, the majority of the USCCB would like to use the Eucharist as a weapon — something to reward those who agree with their political stances. By writing this statement, and setting up a November meeting on the topic, the bishops are on a collision course with American Catholics, the U.S. president and with the Vatican.

In other words, according to Pope Francis himself, the Eucharist is not for the perfect, nor the doctrinally pure, but for those who have “fragilities.”

The U.S. bishops know very well that they cannot promulgate a ruling about the Eucharist, and who gets it or doesn’t, without Vatican approval. What they can do is dominate the media narrative ahead of the 2022 election cycle and tip conservative Catholics more firmly into the Republican camp. Given the political leanings of some Catholic priests in the 2020 election cycle who condemned Biden, this isn’t shocking.

Politicians who now find themselves targets of the USCCB surely won’t be surprised. Nearly 60 Catholic House Democrats sent a statement to the bishops last week outlining their own concerns. The idea of members being denied the Eucharist while campaigning would surely overwhelm political coverage. The bishops are putting their fingers on the scale and hiding behind the church to do so.

It is disingenuous for the bishops to say this attempt to change the rules regarding the Eucharist is nonpolitical. Catholics, cradle and convert alike, know the rules are often broken. All Catholics have seen someone who wasn’t Catholic come up to the Communion rail, receive the Eucharist and walk off, unscathed. Plenty of divorced Catholics continue to take Communion as well, as do more secret sinners — with transgressions both large and small. This is a new front in the culture war, plain and simple.

The irony in all of this is that this week begins “Religious Freedom Week” for the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. While these religious leaders tout how much they love America and freedom, they are actively trying to turn the American church into a political force in the same vein as evangelicals. By tying the Eucharist to political issues, they risk alienating their flocks, their priests and the politicians they claim they want to adhere to church teachings.

The only winners here are Republicans — who are majority Protestants.

Reposted from MSNBC

]]>
For evangelicals, the moral outrage over abortion is about race, gender – and ultimately, power https://antheabutler.com/for-evangelicals-the-moral-outrage-over-abortion-is-about-race-gender-and-ultimately-power/ Thu, 01 Sep 2022 15:17:42 +0000 https://antheabutler.com/?p=2430 For evangelicals, the moral outrage over abortion is about race, gender – and ultimately, power Read More

]]>

While the majority of Americans support making abortion legal in most or all cases, 74% of white evangelical protestants believe it should be illegal, according to the most recent Pew Research poll. “Evangelicals always use morality to put forth issues that will allow them to have political power,” says Dr. Anthea Butler, Chair of Religious Studies at the University of Pennsylvania. The moral outrage over abortion masks their attempts to undermine other issues and groups of people. For them, Dr. Butler tells Ali Velshi, “the point has always been…how do we assert ourselves in the nation’s history based on our religious beliefs?”

]]>